received a message from Jesus, the resurrected
Savior that she reports to the disciples... Peter
does not trust her story. He is upset that Jesus
would say things to Mary, a woman, that HE did
not say to him. The scriptures show us that Peter
was like that. The Lord loved him and trusted him
in spite of his very "human" ways. I
wrote a novel in 1993 and through the novel, I
came to know Peter, in the Spirit. He became my
friend. Strange as it was, he was there in
Peace be with you - receive
my peace in your hearts. Take care that no one
led you astray by saying such things as,
"Look here!" or "Look over
there!" For the Son of Man is among you.
Follow him! Those who look for him will find
Go then and
preach the good news of the kingdom. Do
not lay down any rules beyond those that I have
never dispense law like a lawgiver. You may find
yourself breaking your own rules and constrained
by your own laws!
I Take This To Mean: No
Man-Made Doctrines! As I have always said, do not
make up (man-made) doctrine and label it as God's
word and package it in the name of a
denomination. This seems to be what most
denominations have done. There should not be
different denominations! Only one! The
Denomination of Jesus' Church. THAT IS NOT THE
CATHOLIC CHURCH - NOT THE BAPTIST DENOMINATION -
NOT PENTECOST and so on...
The Gospel Of Mary is not
part of the King James authorized bible. It was
not accepted by the committee at the first
council of NICEA, under Constantine. The
"Council" approved or declined the
scriptures (325AD) that make up the KJV which was
finalized 1611AD. In the books of the apocrypha
there are many scriptures that are very
informative but not in the authorized KJV bible.
The Gospel of Mary is dated to the second
century. This fact creates a shadow of doubt.
As for Mary being the actual
author of the Gospel of John... one of the four
gospels in the New Testament - Mary may or may
not be the author... There are those who are
convinced that she is the author of the Gospel of
John... many believe she is not the author... I
accept the belief that John, Jesus' cousin is the
author. I don't bog down in arguing over theories
that can't be proven - they only raise doubts.
Read the holy book and let the Holy Spirit lead
you in gaining knowledge from the pure GENIUS
that is reflected in the scriptures. It is truly
divine and fascinating!
If you simply glance at the
scriptures and don't get into understanding
through total immersion it will mean very little
to you and you surely can't see the brilliance
and truth that the bible sheds. I doubt you could
skip around "War and Peace" with the
same level of insincerity (and neglect) and get
much from that secular masterpiece either.
The "Da Vinci
Code" has brought a lot of attention to Mary
Magdelene... I'm sure there will be a lot of
misinformation on this subject... In these last
days there will be many who come against the Word
of God - - - taking many weak Christians down the
In my opinion: The book, The
Da Vinci Code, is found in the
"Fiction" section of the book stores...
I accept it as it is advertised... FICTION... A
NOVEL! Don't read and accept it as
"gospel" or anything anointed by God!
IT'S A NOVEL!!! The movie is a work of Satan just
as "The Passion" was.
The author (Brown) wrote The
Da Vinci Code for fame and fortune. He knew that
people who want NOT to believe in a
"divine" Jesus would jump all over a
text that drags Jesus down to our level of common
humanity. Makes no difference that it is not
founded in truth as long as it is in print and
they can point to the text as some sort of
In the first place Da Vinci
a person on which to risk your soul.
Take a break... This remark
is way off
the subject but a good analogy... Kinda reminds
me of Rush Limbaugh... He presented his show as
entertainment and many people thought he was
serious! They made him a serious factor in the
world of politics. I bet Rush laughs all the way
to the bank! By-the-way, does anybody know what
happened with the drug charges? Was he getting
the drugs for himself or somebody else and why? I
don't know if he is simply ignorant or acting,
either way he is a negative factor for mankind.
Another clear indicator of how far we have
slipped in our reasoning and discernment.
Back on the ranch...
In the book, the author writes that Jesus married
Mary Magdalene and fathered at least one child. I
doubt that there is any truth in this theory,
however, after consideration, it would not hinder
my faith in Jesus being the Son of God and The
Savior. God created sex and it's only sinful when
misused. Marriage and union of male and female is
We are told, by some, that
Jesus' "sect" did not allow marriage.
For that matter HIS "sect" did not
allow drinking alcohol either but if you place
total trust in the KJV, you see that HIS first
miracle was making the stuff. I wonder; is this
another area in which Constantine and his band of
Bishops edited the original scripture? We know
they invited Pagan holidays, rituals and
celebrations into the authorized text and
Personally, I see no reason
to even consider the thought that Brown instills
in unknowing and innocent sheep. Jesus taught us
enough, as published, to enable us to receive the
Holy Spirit which is our our way to truth and the
Kingdom. It then becomes up to us to choose. We
excercise our greatest power, the power to
choose. Choose well. Who knows? That simple
choice may determine eternity.
Throw enough doubt and worthless theories on the
wall and a large percentage of dummies will jump
all over it and feel that they are knowledgeable
about a subject that they were too lazy to
explore in it's original presentation. Here's a
way they can ignore the facts and put themselves
on an equal footing with scholars and theologians
who have spent much time and effort to present
the truth to this worthless, evil, lying bunch of
ghouls who look for a reason to trash "that
which is good."
I think it's a way for the
New Agers to reduce the Son of God to the level
of us foul, evil humans. The (demonic) New Agers
want you to be ready to accept the anti-Christ as
a divine being of human reproduction. Jesus
was/is The Son of God - Not the father of evil
human beings! Besides - the facts show the entire
story is a lie - but - we Americans buy into
lies... look at your
elected president, GW Bush! Look at your
elected congress and senate! Enough said?
Not that there is anything
wrong with marriage but Jesus, The Son Of God was
here for more important reasons - like saving our
eternal souls! This is how some mercenaries pay
Him back! They'll have eternity to reconsider
their wrongs - in my opinion! Opinions are like
noses, we all have one.
There are those who point to
the Apostle Paul's teachings about marriage... he
suggests that it is better if we don't marry...
If that happened only non-Christians would
reproduce... No more Christians? Perhaps we
misunderstood Paul's intent here? UH-OH, I
forgot! Paul wrongly thought that Jesus was
coming in his own lifetime. While I am fussing,
let me fuss... I'm not happy with the vast number
of different denominations who twisted Paul's
letters to accommodate their brand of salvation.
I'm sorry to be so cranky
today. This page just seems like a good place to
vent anger:) Smile, God loves you.
Don't let this novel (The Da
Vinci Code) influence your faith! There will be
many false prophets as well as writers who will
sell their soul for a royalty check and/or
By the way - I believe Mary
was a very loyal and faithful disciple of Jesus.
She was there at the foot of the cross while He
suffered and died - she was the first at the tomb
the morning of HIS resurrection. SHE WAS NOT HIS
WIFE! The Catholic church started this celibacy
requirement. Peter, the "Rock" of
Jesus' church was married! By the way... where is
Peter's church? I mean,, most of them sound more
like Paul's church. Is this another product of
the Council at Nicea? Lord forgive my uneasy,
unpeaceful feeling about all of this.
Question everything that
comes from the hands of man! If your name is
written in the Lamb's Book of Life, you'll know
the answer... in time.
P.S. Here's a good link